Which scenario demonstrates an exception to the Labor Code 3600 special risk concept?

Which scenario demonstrates an exception to the Labor Code 3600 special risk concept?

• A. The employee is subjected to a special risk due to employment.
• B. Not applicable
• C. Only if on premises
• D. Always denies

Answer: (A)

Under Labor Code 3600, certain hazards are considered special to a particular kind of employment. When an injury arises from those job-specific risks, it is treated as connected to the work in a way that supports workers’ compensation coverage, even if the danger isn’t a general risk people face outside that job. This makes the scenario where the employee is subjected to a special risk precisely because of the employment the correct example of the exception: the risk is intrinsic to the job, not something unrelated or incidental to everyday life. The other options don’t describe a job-specific hazard driving the injury, so they don’t illustrate this exception.

Under Labor Code 3600, certain hazards are considered special to a particular kind of employment. When an injury arises from those job-specific risks, it is treated as connected to the work in a way that supports workers’ compensation coverage, even if the danger isn’t a general risk people face outside that job. This makes the scenario where the employee is subjected to a special risk precisely because of the employment the correct example of the exception: the risk is intrinsic to the job, not something unrelated or incidental to everyday life. The other options don’t describe a job-specific hazard driving the injury, so they don’t illustrate this exception.